Shroud of turin radiocarbon dating wrong

The authenticity of the Shroud of Turin has been in question for centuries and scientific investigations over the last few decades have only seemed to muddle the debate.Is the revered cloth a miracle or an elaborate hoax?Analogously, the researchers theorize further that neutron flux increments, in correspondence to seismic activity, should be a result of the same reactions.

shroud of turin radiocarbon dating wrong-24shroud of turin radiocarbon dating wrong-34shroud of turin radiocarbon dating wrong-82shroud of turin radiocarbon dating wrong-28

That's why scientists can look at the carbon-14 concentration in organic archaeological materials like fabrics, bones and wood to estimate age.However, no plausible physical reason has yet been proposed to explain the origin of this neutron radiation.Now Carpinteri's team, through mechanical and chemical experimentation, hypothesizes that high-frequency pressure waves generated in the Earth's crust during earthquakes are the source of such neutron emissions.These web sites are maintained by members of the Shroud Science Group: The Shroud of Turin (B. Porter) Shroud of Turin Education Project (in memory of Father Kim Dreisbach) Scientific papers (of G. Svensson) Council for Study of the Shroud of Turin (A. (Phys.org) —An earthquake in Old Jerusalem might be behind the famous image of the Shroud of Turin, says a group of researchers led by Alberto Carpinteri of the Politecnico di Torino in Italy in an article published in Springer's journal Meccanica.But Cesare Nosiglia, the Archbishop of Turin and "pontifical custodian of the shroud," said the special display on Holy Saturday "means that it represents a very important testimony to the Passion and the resurrection of the Lord," The Telegraph reported.The burial shroud purports to show the imprint of the face and body of a bearded man.Now, a study claims neutron emissions from an ancient earthquake that rocked Jerusalem could have created the iconic image, as well as messed up the radiocarbon levels that later suggested the shroud was a medieval forgery.But other scientists say this newly proposed premise leaves some major questions unanswered. Though the Catholic Church doesn't have an official position on the cloth, the relic is visited by tens of thousands of worshippers at the Turin Cathedral in Italy each year. The first records of the shroud begin to appear in medieval sources around the same time, which skeptics don't think is a coincidence.The Vatican, tiptoeing carefully, has never claimed that the 14-foot linen cloth was, as some believers claim, used to cover Christ after he was taken from the cross 2,000 years ago.Francis, reflecting that careful Vatican policy, on Saturday called the cloth, which is kept in a climate-controlled case, an "icon" -- not a relic.

You must have an account to comment. Please register or login here!